Overview of assessment of change for all indicators
The table below summarises traffic light assessments over the
longer term and since 2000, for the 24 indicators and their
component measures.
|
Indicator number (Strategic Goal
/ number), title, and measures where applicable
|
Long-term
change1
|
Change since
20002
|
|
A1. Awareness, understanding and support for
conservation
|
Under development, no
interim
measure(s) available
|
|
A2. Taking action for nature: volunteer time
spent in conservation
|

|

|
|
A3. Value of biodiversity integrated into
decision making
|
Under development, no
interim
measure(s) available
|
|
A4. Global biodiversity impacts of UK economic
activity / sustainable consumption
|
Under development, no
interim
measure(s) available
|
|
|
|
B1. Agricultural and forest area
under environmental management schemes
|
B1a. Area of land in agri-environment
schemes
|
B1a(i). Higher-level / targeted schemes
|

1992–2011
|

|
|
B1a(ii). Entry-level type schemes
|

|
2005
|
|
B1b. Area of forestry land certified as
sustainably managed
|

|
2001
|
|
B2. Sustainable fisheries
|

1990–2010
|

|
|
B3. Integration of biodiversity considerations
into business activity
|
Under development, no
interim
measure(s) available
|
|
B4. Pressure from climate change
|
Not assessed
|
Not assessed
|
|
B5. Pressure from pollution
|
B5a. Air pollution
|
B5a(i). Area affected by acidity
|

1996–2007
|

|
|
B5a(ii). Area affected by nitrogen
|

1996–2007
|

|
|
B5b. Marine pollution
|

1990–2010
|

|
|
B6. Pressure from invasive species
|
B6a. Freshwater invasive species
|

1960–2008
|

|
|
B6b. Marine invasive species
|

1960–2008
|

|
|
B6c. Terrestrial invasive species
|

1960–2008
|

|
|
B7. Water quality
|

1990–2009
|

|
|
|
|
C1. Protected sites
|
C1a. Total area of protected sites: on
land
|

1980–2011
|

|
|
C1b. Total area of protected sites: at sea
|

1980–2011
|

|
|
C1c. Condition of A/SSSIs
|

|
2005-6
|
|
C2. Habitat connectivity
|
C2a. Broad-leaved, mixed and yew
woodland
|

|
1998
|
|
C2b. Neutral grassland
|

|
1998
|
|
C3. Status of threatened habitats
|

|
1999
|
|
C4. Status of threatened species
|

|
1999
|
|
C5. Birds of the wider countryside and at
sea
|
C5a. Farmland birds
|

1970–2010
|

|
|
C5b. Woodland birds
|

1970–2010
|

|
|
C5c. Wetland birds
|

1975–2010
|

|
|
C5d. Seabirds
|

1970–2010
|

|
|
C5e. Wintering water birds
|

1975/6–2009/10
|

|
|
C6. Insects of the wider countryside
(butterflies)
|
C6a. Semi-natural habitat specialists
|

1976–2011
|

|
|
C6b. Species of the wider countryside
|

1976–2011
|

|
|
C7. Plants of the wider countryside
|
C7a. Change in plant species richness (arable
and horticultural land)
|

1990–2007
|
1998
|
|
C7b. Change in plant species richness
(woodland and grassland)
|

1990–2007
|
1998
|
|
C7c. Change in plant species richness
(boundary habitats)
|

1990–2007
|
1998
|
|
C8. Mammals of the wider countryside
(bats)
|

1978–1992
|

|
|
C9. Genetic resources for food and
agriculture
|
C9a. Native sheep breeds
|

|
2001
|
|
C9b. Native cattle breeds
|

|
2001
|
|
|
|
D1. Biodiversity and ecosystem services
(marine – fish size classes in the North Sea)
|

1982–2010
|

|
|
D2. Biodiversity and ecosystem services
(other)
|
Under development, no
interim
measure(s) available
|
|
|
|
E1. Biodiversity data for decision making
|
Under development, no
interim
measure(s) available
|
|
E2. Expenditure on UK and international
biodiversity
|
E2a. Expenditure on UK biodiversity
|

|

|
|
E2b. UK Expenditure on international
biodiversity
|

|

|
1 The earliest available year is
used as the baseline for assessment of long-term change. The base
year used for each measure is shown in the table. Where data are
unavailable, or do not precede 1996, a long-term assessment is not
given.
2 If no data are available in 2000,
the nearest alternative year has been used and is stated next to
the trafic light.
Improving
Little or no overall change
Deteriorating
Insufficient or no comparable data
The individual assessments for each measure can be combined to
produce an overall assessment. This provides a summary of
progress without the need to combine the indicators
themselves.
The pie charts below display the numbers of measures that have
shown an improvement (green traffic light), a deterioration (red
traffic light), little or no overall change (amber traffic light)
or that have insufficient data for an assessment to be made (white
traffic light). Assessments of change over the longer term
and since 2000 are shown.
The UK Government is a signatory to the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) and is committed to the new biodiversity goals and
targets agreed in 2010 and set out in the
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity
2011–2020.3 The Strategic Plan has five
goals, each with a number of targets (the focus of each goal is
shown by the words in bold type below):
A. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by
mainstreaming biodiversity across government and
society
B. Reduce the direct pressures on
biodiversity and promote sustainable use
C. To improve the status of biodiversity by
safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity
D. Enhance the benefits to all from
biodiversity and ecosystems
E. Enhance implementation through planning,
knowledge management and capacity building
As well as overall summaries based on all measures in the
indicators, separate summaries for Strategic Goals B and C are
shown which are based on the indicators and measures linked to
those goals (B1 to B7; C1 to C9). A number of indicators are
under development for Strategic Goals A, D, and E, so they
currently have very few measures – separate pie charts
are therefore not shown.
Assessment of change: all measures

Of the 35 measures used to compile the ‘all measures’ summary
chart, 17 (49 per cent) show an improvement since 2000, compared
with 11 measures (31 per cent) showing improvement over the
longer term. Those showing improvement since 2000 include
conservation volunteering, the extent of protected sites both on
land and at sea, the percentage of woodland certified as
sustainably managed, sustainable fisheries, water quality, and
expenditure on both UK and international biodiversity.
Measures showing long-term deterioration include populations of
farmland birds and woodland birds, populations of butterflies which
are strongly associated with semi-natural habitats, bat populations
and plant diversity (in woodland and grassland, and in boundary
habitats). Some of these measures have continued to
deteriorate in the short term (e.g. farmland birds and the plant
diversity of boundary habitats). Bat populations have shown
improvement since 2000, whilst butterflies have shown little or no
overall change for both semi-natural habitat specialists and
butterflies of the wider countryside.
Assessment of change: Strategic Goals

The indicators under Strategic Goal B
(indicators prefixed 'B' in the summary table) show progress is
being made to address the pressures on biodiversity (e.g. in the
proportion of fisheries that are sustainable, in the area of land
in agri-environment schemes, and in the area of woodland certified
as sustainably managed). There is both long- and short-term
deterioration for marine and terrestrial invasive species,
reflecting a pattern of continuing or growing threat to
biodiversity in the UK.
There were long-term declines for six measures
(30 per cent) under Strategic Goal C (indicator number prefixed 'C'
in the summary table, covering status of biodiversity), reflecting
the declines in plant, bird, butterfly and bat populations seen in
the 1970s and 1980s. Since 2000, these long-term declines
have generally slowed, with some measures previously assessed as
deteriorating showing either improvement (e.g. bats) or little or
no overall change (e.g. butterflies, woodland birds, wetland birds,
and seabirds) since 2000. These conclusions should be viewed
with some caution as changes are more difficult to assess over the
short term. One measure within Strategic Goal C, wintering
water birds, shows a long-term improvement, but deterioration since
2000.
3 The targets are known as 'Aichi
Targets', after the province in Japan where they were agreed.