Report 352
Wildlife and pollution: 2001-02
(2005)
Shore, R.F, Malcolm, H.M, Wienburg, C.L, Walker, L.A, Turk, A, Horne, J.A
The Wildlife and Pollution contract covers a long-term monitoring programme, the Predatory Bird Monitoring Scheme (PBMS), that examines the levels of certain pollutants in selected wildlife species in Britain.
Introduction
The Wildlife and Pollution contract covers a long-term
monitoring programme, the Predatory Bird Monitoring Scheme (PBMS),
that examines the levels of certain pollutants in selected wildlife
species in Britain. The programme was started in the early 1960s,
when there were serious concerns over the effects of organochlorine
insecticides and organomercury fungicides on various species of
birds and mammals. This early work demonstrated the effects of the
organochlorines and eventually contributed to the ban on their use
in the UK and abroad. The programme has subsequently assessed the
success of these bans by measuring whether there has been a decline
in the concentrations of organochlorine pesticides in the livers
and eggs of predatory and freshwater fish-eating birds.
Investigations have also been made into the levels of industrial
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), following their identification as
pollutants in 1966. Mercury levels, derived from both agricultural
and industrial sources, have also been tracked, although mercury
concentrations were not measured in birds collected in 2001. In
recent years, investigations have been made into the effects of the
newest generation of rodenticides on barn owls Tyto alba.
Northern gannet Morus bassanus eggs are also collected
approximately biennially from two colonies and, when available,
from other sites; eggs were last collected in 2000.
This programme is now the longest-running of its kind anywhere
in the world and the findings stimulate considerable interest
internationally, as well as in Britain. Annual reports give an
interim summary of results and every three years these annual
results are gathered together into a more substantial report in
which they are integrated with previous findings. The latest report
of this type covers the period up to and including 2000 (Shore
et al. 2005). Results are published periodically in the
scientific literature. This current report presents the results of
analyses carried out on material collected in 2001. It also
includes a review of long-term trends in second-generation
anticoagulant rodenticide residues in barn owls that occurred
during the monitoring period up to and including the year
2001.
The Wildlife and Pollution contract was the subject of
scientific assessment within JNCC's rolling programme of peer
review in autumn 1993 and was further assessed in 1996. As a result
of the last two assessments, some monitoring was curtailed. Most
notably, common kestrels Falco tinnunculus are no longer
monitored for organochlorines. However, from 2001 onwards, kestrels
will be monitored for second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides
following the results from an individual study, carried out as part
of the PBMS activities, which demonstrated that this species may be
particularly vulnerable to exposure to these compounds (Shore
et al. 2001). Carcasses and eggs of predatory bird species
(such as peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus, common buzzard
Buteo buteo, long-eared owl Asio otus, little owl
Athene noctua, common kingfisher Alcedo atthis,
great crested grebe Podiceps cristatus, and great bittern
Botaurus stellaris) which do not form the core part of the
PBMS, but are sent to the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)
by volunteers, are not analysed chemically. However, post-mortem
examinations are carried out the carcasses, relevant information is
recorded and the cause of death is determined (and reported back to
the volunteer who submitted the carcass). Samples of the egg
contents and body organs for these species, and samples for the
species that do form part of the core monitoring, are all archived
at -20°C as part of CEH's unique long-term tissue bank, and are
often used in specific targeted research studies in subsequent
years.
Each section within the Wildlife and Pollution contract is
summarised below. Each is dependent on the provision of material
from amateur naturalists and other interested parties, and it is
not always possible to obtain desired material for analysis,
especially from remote areas.
You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this
document.
26 pages
ISSN 0963 8091
Please cite as: Shore, R.F, Malcolm, H.M, Wienburg, C.L, Walker, L.A, Turk, A, Horne, J.A, (2005), Wildlife and pollution: 2001-02, JNCC Report 352, 26 pages, ISSN 0963 8091