Herring Gull Larus argentatus

Status;  International importance;  Population estimates;  Distribution;  Annual abundance/ productivity; Phenology/diet/survival

 

Description

Larus argentatus vignette

The following was adapted from original text by Brian Madden and Stephen F. Newton in Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland (with permission from A&C Black, London).

 

The herring gull has a near Holarctic distribution, breeding mainly in the middle and high latitudes. It is widely distributed around the coasts of the British Isles, and prefers to nest on rocky coastline, with cliffs, islets and offshore islands, though a range of other habitats are used including sand dunes, shingle banks and, increasingly, buildings in urban areas. A small proportion of the population nests inland, mainly on lake islands and moorland. The herring gull is an opportunist feeder, being both predator and scavenger. While primarily a coastal feeder, it readily takes advantage of the often abundant food supplies available indirectly from man, especially waste from the fishing industry and landfill sites. Outside of the breeding season, herring gulls are common along coastlines and inshore waters but also occur inland.

 


Conservation status

 

Herring gull is currently identified as a conservation priority in the following:

Red listed in Birds of Conservation Concern 3 (2009 update)

UK BAP - priority species

(further information on Conservation Designations for UK Taxa)

Red listed in Birds of Conservation Concern in Ireland 2 (2007 update)

 


International importance

 

UK Population % Biogeographic Population % World Population
 139,200 AON* 18.5 12.1
 
*AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
 

The UK population figure (rounded to the nearest hundred) was derived from data in Mitchell, P.I., Newton, S.F., Ratcliffe, N. and Dunn, T.E. (eds.) 2004. Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland. Poyser, London. This was also the source of figures for the Biogeographic and World populations.

Note: The UK population figure above includes data from both inland and coastal colonies hence differs from that tabled below.

 


UK population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

Seabird 2000 represents the first attempt to census all inland breeding colonies of herring gulls. However, only 1% of herring gulls in the UK breed away from the coast. Coverage in Seabird 2000, although not complete, was comprehensive across the different colony types and all major colonies and breeding areas were censused. Inland Durham was not surveyed and some large roof-nesting colonies in Dumfries (Dumfries and Galloway), Jarrow (Northumberland), Sunderland (Tyne and Wear) and in Dover & Folkestone (Kent) were also missed. Elsewhere, coverage of roof-nesting gulls was good, abetted by aerial surveys in places like south Wales, Gloucester, Glasgow and Inverness. At most colonies apparently occupied nests (AON) were counted. However, at some colonies, flush counts of individuals attending the colony were made and then divided by two to provide a rough measure of the number of AON. This is the least accurate method for censusing breeding gulls, as such counts will include an unknown percentage of non-breeders and attendance at the colony by both members of a pair is highly variable throughout the day and throughout the breeding season. During Seabird 2000, only 4% of the population estimate for the UK was obtained from counts of individuals, compared to 6% during the SCR Census (1985-88). Hence the estimates from the two censuses are comparable in terms of the methods used. In mixed colonies, more often than not shared with lesser black-backed gulls, the determination of the proportion of a count to assign to a particular species provides a further potential source of error, as the eggs of the two species can not be readily distinguished. In all but the smallest colonies it was recommended that the proportion of herring gulls be determined from sample head counts representative of the colony as a whole.

 

 

Operation Seafarer

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000

(1998-2002)

UK Population estimate (AON*) 285,929 149,197 130,230
% change since previous census N/a -48 -13

 

*AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

For census results for individual countries and Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man see under relevant sections below.

 


Distribution/abundance

 

The Seabird 2000 census provides the most comprehensive recent assessment of the distribution and abundance of breeding seabirds. Numbers of herring gull found in different regions, and a map showing where colonies are found and how large they are is provided in the Seabird 2000 herring gull results page (PDF, 2.1 mb).

 

An interactive map is available on the NBN Gateway, where you can filter to display only the Seabird 2000 data.  For more recent, but less comprehensive, coverage view the distribution on the NBN with all available contributing datasets

 

The locations sampled during the annual Seabird Monitoring Programme provide some information on distribution and are accessible via the Seabird Monitoring Programme online database.

 


Annual abundance and productivity by geographical area

 



 

Breeding abundance

 

UK herring gull abundance 2010

Figure 1: Trend in UK abundance index (solid line) of herring gull 1986-2010 with 95% confidence limits (dotted lines). Based on SMP data; view the methods of analysis (PDF 158 kb).

 

Between 1969/70 and 1985-88, the UK herring gull population decreased by 48%. This decline continued between 1987 and 1990, with a subsequent recovery to 1994 (Figure 1). A further decline, rapid at the start, occurred between 2000 and 2010. At the time of the Seabird 2000 census, around 14% of the population nested on buildings, as compared with natural habitats; a proportion and total number that increased from 1976 (when just 63 pairs nested on roofs) to 1993-951 (10,900) and 1998-2002 (20,000). The abundant food supply in urban areas provided by street litter and insecure refuse bags/bins, combined with abundant safe nesting sites, has probably encouraged this increase1. We do not know the current number of urban nesting gulls.

 

Despite the increases in urban-nesters, the total herring gull population is now at its lowest level since monitoring began in 1969/70. The reason for the decline is not well understood. Botulism is thought to have been a major factor in the decline between the first two censuses and possibly thereafter; refuse tips may be the source of the Clostridium botulinum bacterium that causes the disease, which also is widespread in wetland sediments2. Decreases in the availability of food scavenged from refuse tips (associated with changes in refuse management in recent years)2 and reductions in discards from fisheries3 have also likely played a role in decreasing herring gull populations. Ground predators have also had an affect at some colonies.

 

Productivity

 

UK herring gull success 2010

Figure 2: Trend in UK productivity (no. of chicks fledged per pair) of herring gull 1986-2010. Based on SMP data; view the methods of analysis (PDF 158 kb).

 

Although there are big fluctuations in UK herring gull productivity between 1989 and 1999 there does appear to be an underlying declining trend during this period. From 2000 onwards productivity improved and has been relatively stable over the last decade although has never been high. Most information comes from a study of the effects of mink control on productivity of gulls and terns in western Scotland, which shows significant depressive effects of mink, for example by an estimated 26% in 2009, and by 30% in 20104.

 

 

Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

 

Operation Seafarer    

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register    

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000    

(1998-2002)

Population estimate (AON*) 159,237 92,950 71,659
% change since previous census    N/a -42 -23

 

* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

Breeding abundance

 

Scot herring gull abundance 2010

Figure 1: Trend in abundance index (solid line) of herring gull in Scotland,1986-2010 with 95% confidence limits (dotted lines). Based on SMP data; view the methods of analysis (PDF 158 kb).

 

The trend for Scotland shown above shows a decreasing index during the late 1980s, followed by a period of relative stability before another decline from 2000 onward, so that herring gull abundance is currently close to its lowest point. In the longer term a 42% decline occurred between Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register. In summary, herring gull numbers are now far lower than at any time since 1969/70.

Numbers nesting on buildings in towns and cities increased from 1976 (55 pairs) to 1993-951 (3,568) and 1998-2002 (5,843). The current size of the population in towns is unknown. The increases in urban-nesters does not make up for the overall declines recorded at coastal colonies.

 

Productivity

 

Scot herring gull success 2010

Figure 2. Trend in productivity (no. of chicks fledged per pair) of herring gulls in Scotland, 1986-2010. Based on SMP data; view the methods of analysis  (PDF 158 kb).

 

The graph above closely matches that shown for the UK as much of the data is collected in Scotland. The trend in productivity for Scotland appeared to be declining during the first half of the recording period and was especially low from 1997-1999. This was probably due to predation by American mink at colonies on the west coast. Since 2000, productivity has been relatively stable, perhaps in response to trapping programmes at colonies where mink were active.

 

 

Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

 

Operation Seafarer    

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register    

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000    

(1998-2002)

Population estimate (AON*) 62,114 27,597 43,932
% change since previous census    N/a -56 +59

 

* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

Breeding abundance

 

Eng herring gull abundance 2010

Figure 1: Abundance of herring gull at South Walney,1986-2010.

 

In common with herring gull populations in Scotland and Wales, numbers in England declined greatly between the censuses in 1969/70 and 1985-88. By Seabird 2000, although the population had increased, numbers were still some 18,000 pairs lower than during Operation Seafarer. The trend in abundance calculated from colonies sampled for the SMP over-estimates this increase, so is unrepresentative. However, numbers at the largest colony, on South Walney, have fallen by three-quarters between 2000 and 2010. Of other large colonies (>1,000 pairs) monitored regularly over the last decade Rockcliffe, Orfordness and Outer Trial Bank have all declined with only Steep Holm increasing. In contrast, the number of roof-nesters increased greatly, from 1960 pairs in 1976 to 6,383 pairs in 1993-951 and to 12,284 pairs by Seabird 2000. The current size of the urban population is unknown, though recent increases have occurred in towns in SW England.

 

Productivity

 

Relatively few data are available on the productivity of herring gulls at English colonies. There was no statistically significant variation over time; on average approximately 0.67 chicks fledge per pair per year.

 

 

Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

 

Operation Seafarer    

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register    

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000    

(1998-2002)

Population estimate (AON*) 48,576 11,089 13,930
% change since previous census    N/a -77 +26

 

* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

Breeding abundance

 

Herring gull numbers fell by 77% in Wales between Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register and although an increase (of 26%) was detected by Seabird 2000 numbers recorded were still 25,000 pairs lower than in 1969/70. Further losses may have occurred over the last decade; 27 colonies counted in 2010 held 5,582 pairs compared with 6,127 pairs in 2000, representing a fall of 9%, although this change could easily be accounted for by other sources of error e.g. observer differences, timing of survey relative to timing of nesting. Roof-nesters increased from 772 pairs in 1993-951 to 1,826 pairs in Seabird 2000.

 

Productivity

 

Wales herring gull success 2010

Figure 1. Trend in productivity (no. of chicks fledged per pair) of herring gulls in Wales, 1986-2010. Based on SMP data; view the methods of analysis  (PDF 158 kb).

 

The number of herring gull chicks fledged at colonies in Wales has been declining since 1994. Birds were very successful in that year, fledging almost two chicks per pair but between 1998 and 2010 herring gulls have usually fledged less than one chick per pair. Productivity was particularly low in 2008 due to unknown factors.

 

 

Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

 

Operation Seafarer    

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register    

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000    

(1998-2002)

Population estimate (AON*) 16,002 17,561 709
% change since previous census    N/a +10 -96

 

* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

Breeding abundance

 

NI herring gull abundance 2010

Figure 1: Trend in abundance index (solid line) of herring gull in Northern Ireland,1986-2010 with 95% confidence limits (dotted lines). Based on SMP data; view the methods of analysis (PDF 158 kb).

 

Seabird 2000 found that herring gull numbers in Northern Ireland had declined severely since the previous census. Between Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register numbers were buoyant when populations in other UK countries, and in the Republic of Ireland, were falling. The subsequent massive decline of 96% left just 709 pairs by Seabird 2000. Botulism has been suspected as the main cause for large losses at some colonies e.g. Rathlin Island, the Copeland Islands and Strangford Lough. Figure 1 reveals that there has been only a very limited increase in abundance during the last decade, mostly during the last few years. Few herring gulls have been recorded nesting on roofs in Northern Ireland.

 

Productivity

 

Very little systematic data have been collected on the productivity of herring gulls in Northern Ireland as part of the SMP.

 

 

Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

 

Operation Seafarer    

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register    

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000    

(1998-2002)

Population estimate (AON*) 43,710 15,255 5,411
% change since previous census    N/a -65 -64

 

* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

Breeding abundance

 

National census data show the herring gull population of the Republic of Ireland has declined steadily since Operation Seafarer; the Seabird Colony Register recorded a 65% fall with a further decline of 64% by the time of Seabird 2000. Few colonies are monitored frequently, or in any one year, but available data suggest that the decline has continued over the last decade; six colonies surveyed in 2010 held 1,098 pairs compared with 2,556 pairs during Seabird 2000, a fall of close to 60%. Relatively few herring gulls have been recorded nesting on roofs in the Republic of Ireland.

 

Productivity

 

Very few systematic data have been collected on the productivity of herring gulls at colonies in the Republic of Ireland as part of the SMP.

 

 

Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

 

Operation Seafarer    

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register    

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000    

(1998-2002)

Population estimate (AON*) 59,712 32,816 6,120
% change since previous census    N/a -45 -81

 

* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses, so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

Breeding abundance

 

AI herring gull abundance 2010

Figure 1: Trend in abundance index (solid line) of herring gull throughout Ireland,1986-2010 with 95% confidence limits (dotted lines). Based on SMP data; view the methods of analysis (PDF 158 kb).

 

The trend in abundance of herring gull for the whole of Ireland using the SMP sample (Figure 1) closely matches that shown for Northern Ireland, where the majority of samples were collected. National census data showed that herring gull numbers had declined severely between Operation Seafarer and Seabird 2000, although numbers in Northern Ireland were actually stable between the first two censuses. The abundance trend using the SMP sample (Figure 1) suggests only a very limited recovery during the last decade. Relatively few herring gulls have been recorded nesting on roofs in Ireland.

 

Productivity

 

Very few systematic data have been collected on the productivity of herring gulls at colonies throughout Ireland as part of the SMP.

 

 

Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

 

Operation Seafarer    

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register    

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000    

(1998-2002)

Population estimate (AON*) 9,977 9,062 7,126
% change since previous census    N/a -9 -21

 

* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses, so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

Breeding abundance

 

IOM herring gull abundance 2010

Figure 1: Abundance of herring gull on the Calf of Man, 1986-2010.

 

Between Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register there was a decline of 9% in the number of herring gulls nesting on the Isle of Man. A larger decline then occurred so that by Seabird 2000 numbers had fallen a further 21% to 7,126 pairs. The current status of herring gull on the Isle of Man is unknown as only one colony, on the Calf of Man, has been surveyed since Seabird 2000. In the late 1980s and early 1990s this colony regularly held over 10% of the Isle of Man population but in 2010 held 447 pairs, compared to 670 pairs in 1999.  Numbers may have been underestimated in this colony in 2006; just 88 pairs were recorded. Relatively few herring gulls on the Isle of Man have been recorded nesting on roofs. 

 

Productivity

 

Very few systematic data have been collected on the productivity of herring gulls at colonies on the Isle of Man as part of the SMP.

 

 

Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)

 

 

Operation Seafarer    

(1969-70)

Seabird Colony Register    

(1985-88)

Seabird 2000    

(1998-2002)

Population estimate (AON*) 3,970 3,551 4,347
% change since previous census    N/a -11 +22

 

* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests

Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier national censuses, so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.

 

Breeding abundance

 

In common with other areas of the British Isles, the number of herring gulls breeding in the Channel Islands also declined between Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register although the size of this fall, a decline of 11%, was less severe than elsewhere. Numbers increased by 22% between the Seabird Colony Register and Seabird 2000. No data have been collected in the region since 1998-2002, so the current status of the population is unknown. 

 

Productivity

 

Few systematic productivity data have been collected for herring gull in the Channel Islands as part of the SMP.

 

 


UK phenology, diet, survival rates

 

Phenology

No systematic data on phenology (timing of life-cycle events) have been collected as part of the SMP.

 

Diet

No systematic data on diet have been collected as part of the SMP.

 

Survival rate

Figure 2 shows there has been a slight decline in adult survival over most of the study period. The extent to which this trend is representative of the UK as a whole is not known.

 

Skomer herring gull survival

Figure 2. Estimated adult survival rate of herring gull on Skomer, Pembrokeshire, 1987-2009.

 


References

1 Raven, S.J. and Coulson, J.C. 1997. The distribution and abundance of Larus gulls nesting on buildings in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study 44: 13-34. 

2 Madden, B. and Newton, S.F.  2004. Herring Gull Larus argentatus. In: Mitchell, P.I., Newton, S.F., Ratcliffe, N. and Dunn, T.E. (eds.) 2004. Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland: 242-262. Poyser, London.

3 Furness, R.W., Ensor, K. & Hudson, A.V. 1992. The use of fishery waste by gull populations around the British Isles. Ardea 80: 105-113.

4 Craik, J.C.A. 2010. Results of the mink-seabird project in 2010. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban.

 


Partners

Data have been provided to the SMP by the generous contributions of its partners, other organisations and volunteers throughout Britain and Ireland. Partners to the SMP are: BirdWatch Ireland; The British Trust for Ornithology; Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Countryside Council for Wales; Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Isle of Man); Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Republic of Ireland); States of Guernsey Government; JNCC; Manx Birdlife; Manx National Heritage; The National Trust; National Trust for Scotland; Natural England; Northern Ireland Environment Agency; The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Scottish Natural Heritage; Seabird Group; Shetland Oil Terminal Environmental Advisory Group; Scottish Wildlife Trust.  More about the SMP partners >>

 

Image of herring gull appears courtesy of Ian Rendall ©, is subject to international copyright law and may not be reproduced in any form whatsoever.