Note: Inland colonies were not counted during the two earlier
national censuses so to enable direct comparison the Seabird 2000
figure refers to the coastal population only.
For census results for individual countries and Ireland, the
Channel Islands and the Isle of Man see under relevant
sections below.
An
interactive map is available on the NBN Gateway, where you can
filter to display only the Seabird 2000 data. For more
recent, but less comprehensive, coverage view the distribution on
the NBN with all available contributing datasets
The locations sampled during the annual
Seabird Monitoring Programme provide some information on
distribution and are accessible via the Seabird Monitoring Programme
online database.
Breeding abundance

Figure 1: Trend in UK
abundance index (solid line) of herring gull 1986-2011
with 95% confidence limits (dotted lines). Based on SMP data;
view the methods
of analysis (PDF 158 kb).
Between 1969/70 and 1985-88, the UK herring
gull population decreased by 48%. This decline continued between
1987 and 1990, with a subsequent recovery to 1994 (Figure 1). A
further drop in abundance is apparent after
2000; although rapid at the start, this decline levelled
off for a few years but now appears to be continuing again. At
the time of the Seabird 2000 census, around 14% of
the population nested on buildings, as compared with natural
habitats; a proportion and total number that increased from 1976
(when just 63 pairs nested on roofs) to 1993-951 (10,900) and 1998-2002
(20,000). The abundant food supply in urban areas provided by
street litter and insecure refuse bags/bins, combined with abundant
safe nesting sites, has probably encouraged this
increase1. We do not
know the current number of urban nesting gulls.
Despite the increases in urban-nesters, the
total herring gull population is now at its lowest level since
monitoring began in 1969/70. The reason for the decline is not
well understood. Botulism is thought to have been a major factor in
the decline between the first two censuses and possibly thereafter;
refuse tips may be the source of the Clostridium botulinum
bacterium that causes the disease, which also is widespread in
wetland sediments2.
Decreases in the availability of food scavenged from refuse tips
(associated with changes in refuse management in recent
years)2 and reductions
in discards from fisheries3 have also
likely played a role in decreasing herring gull populations. Ground
predators have also had an affect at some colonies.
Productivity

Figure 2: Trend in
UK productivity (no. of chicks fledged per pair)
of herring gull 1986-2011. Based on SMP data; view
the methods
of analysis (PDF 158 kb).
Although there are big fluctuations in UK
herring gull productivity between 1989 and 1999 there does
appear to be an underlying declining trend during this period. From
2000 onwards productivity improved and has been relatively stable
over the last decade although has never been high. Most
information comes from a study of the effects of mink control
on productivity of gulls and terns in western Scotland, which
shows significant depressive effects
of mink, for example by an estimated 26% in 2009, and by 30% in
20104.
Recent analysis by Cook and
Robinson5 found the
mean breeding success of herring gulls at monitored nests was
0.75 and declined at a rate of 0.016 chicks per nest per
year. This equated to a decline of 31% over the period
1986-2008. The quality of the existing dataset meant a change
in breeding success greater than 10% could be detected with
confidence. Population viability analysis (using available
life history information such as population size, clutch size, age
at first breeding and survival rates of different age classes)
predicted that, were this rate of success to be
maintained, herring gull populations would decline by 60% over
25 years. For the population to stabilize, breeding success
would have to increase to 1.30-1.50 chicks per nest per year.
Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)
| |
Operation Seafarer
(1969-70)
|
Seabird Colony Register
(1985-88)
|
Seabird 2000
(1998-2002)
|
| Population estimate (AON*) |
159,237 |
92,950 |
71,659 |
| % change since previous
census |
N/a |
-42 |
-23 |
* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
Note: Inland colonies were not counted during
the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison
the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.
Breeding abundance

Figure 1: Trend
in abundance index (solid line) of herring gull in
Scotland,1986-2011 with 95% confidence limits (dotted lines). Based
on SMP data; view the methods
of analysis (PDF 158 kb).
The trend for Scotland shown above shows a decreasing index
during the late 1980s, followed by a period of relative stability
before another decline from 2000 onward. Herring gull
abundance in 2011 is now at its lowest point with in index
currently only 42% of that in 1986. This comes on top of
a longer term decline; numbers had already fallen by
42% between Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register. In
summary, herring gull numbers are now far lower than at any
time since 1969/70.
Numbers nesting on buildings in towns and cities
increased from 1976 (55 pairs) to 1993-951 (3,568) and 1998-2002
(5,843). The current size of the population in towns is
unknown. The increases in urban-nesters do not make up for the
overall declines recorded at coastal colonies.
Productivity

Figure 2. Trend
in productivity (no. of chicks fledged per pair)
of herring gulls in Scotland, 1986-2011. Based on SMP
data; view the methods
of analysis (PDF 158 kb).
The graph above closely matches that shown for the UK as much of
the data is collected in Scotland. The trend in productivity for
Scotland appeared to be declining during the first half of the
recording period and was especially low from 1997-1999. This was
probably due to predation by American mink at colonies on the west
coast. Since 2000, productivity has been relatively
stable, perhaps in response to trapping programmes at colonies
where mink were active.
Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)
| |
Operation Seafarer
(1969-70)
|
Seabird Colony Register
(1985-88)
|
Seabird 2000
(1998-2002)
|
| Population estimate (AON*) |
62,114 |
27,597 |
43,932 |
| % change since previous
census |
N/a |
-56 |
+59 |
* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
Note: Inland colonies were not counted during
the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison
the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.
Breeding abundance

Figure 1: Abundance of herring
gull at South Walney, 1986-2011.
In common with herring gull populations in Scotland and Wales,
numbers in England declined greatly between the censuses
in 1969/70 and 1985-88. By Seabird 2000, although the
population had increased, numbers were still some 18,000 pairs
lower than during Operation Seafarer. The trend in abundance,
calculated from colonies sampled for the SMP, over-estimates this
increase, rendering it unrepresentative.
However, numbers at South Walney, the largest colony
in England holding about one-fifth of the national population, had
fallen by three-quarters between 2000 and 2011. Of other large
colonies (>1,000 pairs) monitored regularly over the last
decade, Rockcliffe, Orfordness and Outer Trial Bank have all
declined with only Steep Holm increasing. In
contrast, the number of roof-nesters increased greatly, from 1,960
pairs in 1976 to 6,383 pairs in 1993-951 and to 12,284 pairs by
Seabird 2000. The current size of the urban population is unknown,
though recent increases have occurred in towns in NW and SW
England.
Productivity
Relatively few data are available on the
productivity of herring gulls at English colonies. There
was no statistically significant variation over time; on
average approximately 0.71 chicks fledged per pair
per year between 1990 and 2011.
Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)
| |
Operation Seafarer
(1969-70)
|
Seabird Colony Register
(1985-88)
|
Seabird 2000
(1998-2002)
|
| Population estimate (AON*) |
48,576 |
11,089 |
13,930 |
| % change since previous
census |
N/a |
-77 |
+26 |
* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
Note: Inland colonies were not counted during
the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison
the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.
Breeding abundance
Herring gull numbers fell by 77% in Wales between
Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register and
although an increase (of 26%) was detected by Seabird 2000, numbers
recorded were still 25,000 pairs lower than in
1969/70. Further losses may have occurred over the last
decade; 19 colonies counted in 2011 held 4,782 pairs
compared with 5,435 pairs during Seabird 2000, representing a
fall of 12%, although this change could easily be accounted for by
other sources of error e.g. observer differences, timing of survey
relative to timing of nesting.
Roof-nesters increased from 772 pairs in 1993-951 to 1,826 pairs in Seabird
2000. In 2011, a survey of Cardiff urban gulls alone recorded 640
AON. This represents a remarkable turn around in fortunes as
supposedly no roof-nesting herring gulls were recorded in Cardiff
during Seabird 2000. Previous estimates indicated 425 pairs there
in 1975 falling to 4 pairs by 1993.
Productivity

Figure 1. Trend
in productivity (no. of chicks fledged per pair)
of herring gulls in Wales, 1986-2011. Based on SMP data;
view the methods
of analysis (PDF 158 kb).
The number of herring gull chicks fledged at
colonies in Wales has been declining since 1994. Birds were
very successful in that year, fledging almost two chicks per pair
but between 1998 and 2011 herring gulls have usually fledged less
than one chick per pair. Productivity
was particularly low in 2008 due to unknown factors.
Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)
| |
Operation Seafarer
(1969-70)
|
Seabird Colony Register
(1985-88)
|
Seabird 2000
(1998-2002)
|
| Population estimate (AON*) |
16,002 |
17,561 |
709 |
| % change since previous
census |
N/a |
+10 |
-96 |
* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
Note: Inland colonies were not counted during
the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison
the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.
Breeding abundance

Figure 1: Trend in abundance index (solid
line) of herring gull in Northern Ireland,1986-2011 with
95% confidence limits (dotted lines). Based on SMP data; view
the methods
of analysis (PDF 158 kb).
Seabird 2000 found that herring gull numbers in Northern Ireland
had declined severely since the previous census. Between Operation
Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register, numbers were buoyant when
populations in other UK countries, and in the Republic of
Ireland, were falling. The subsequent massive
decline of 96% left just 709 pairs by Seabird
2000. Botulism has been suspected as the main cause for large
losses at some colonies e.g. Rathlin Island, the Copeland
Islands and Strangford Lough. Figure 1 reveals that there
has been only a very limited increase in abundance during the last
decade, mostly during the last few years. Few herring gulls have
been recorded nesting on roofs in Northern Ireland.
Productivity
Very little systematic data have been collected on the
productivity of herring gulls in Northern Ireland as part of the
SMP.
Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)
| |
Operation Seafarer
(1969-70)
|
Seabird Colony Register
(1985-88)
|
Seabird 2000
(1998-2002)
|
| Population estimate (AON*) |
43,710 |
15,255 |
5,411 |
| % change since previous
census |
N/a |
-65 |
-64 |
* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
Note: Inland colonies were not counted during
the two earlier national censuses so to enable direct comparison
the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.
Breeding abundance
National census data show the herring gull population of the
Republic of Ireland has declined steadily since Operation
Seafarer; the Seabird Colony Register recorded a 65% fall with
a further decline of 64% by the time of Seabird 2000. Few
colonies are monitored frequently, or in any one year (e.g. just
five small colonies in 2011, most holding fewer than 40 pairs),
but available data suggest that the decline has
continued over the last decade; six colonies
surveyed in 2010 held 1,098 pairs compared with 2,556
pairs during Seabird 2000, a fall of close to 60%. Relatively
few herring gulls have been recorded nesting on roofs in the
Republic of Ireland.
Productivity
Very few systematic data have been collected on the
productivity of herring gulls at colonies in the Republic
of Ireland as part of the SMP.
Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)
| |
Operation Seafarer
(1969-70)
|
Seabird Colony Register
(1985-88)
|
Seabird 2000
(1998-2002)
|
| Population estimate (AON*) |
59,712 |
32,816 |
6,120 |
| % change since previous
census |
N/a |
-45 |
-81 |
* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
Note: Inland colonies were not counted during
the two earlier national censuses, so to enable direct comparison
the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.
Breeding abundance

Figure 1: Trend in abundance index (solid
line) of herring gull throughout Ireland, 1986-2011 with
95% confidence limits (dotted lines; drawing of upper limit
restricted to preserve detail in the abundance index). Based on SMP
data; view the methods
of analysis (PDF 158 kb).
The trend in abundance of herring gull for the whole of Ireland
using the SMP sample (Figure 1) closely matches that shown for
Northern Ireland, where the majority of
samples were collected. National census data showed
that herring gull numbers had declined
severely between Operation Seafarer and Seabird 2000, although
numbers in Northern Ireland were actually stable between the first
two censuses. The abundance trend using the SMP sample (Figure
1) suggests only a very limited recovery during the last
decade. Relatively few herring gulls have been recorded nesting on
roofs in Ireland.
Productivity
Very few systematic data have been
collected on the productivity of herring gulls at colonies
throughout Ireland as part of the SMP.
Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)
| |
Operation Seafarer
(1969-70)
|
Seabird Colony Register
(1985-88)
|
Seabird 2000
(1998-2002)
|
| Population estimate (AON*) |
9,977 |
9,062 |
7,126 |
| % change since previous
census |
N/a |
-9 |
-21 |
* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
Note: Inland colonies were not counted during
the two earlier national censuses, so to enable direct comparison
the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.
Breeding abundance

Figure 1: Abundance of herring
gull on the Calf of Man, 1986-2011.
Between Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register
there was a decline of 9% in the number of herring gulls
nesting on the Isle of Man. A larger decline then occurred so
that by Seabird 2000 numbers had fallen a further 21% to 7,126
pairs. The current status of herring gull on the Isle of Man
is unknown as only one colony, on the Calf of Man, has been
surveyed since Seabird 2000. In the late 1980s and early 1990s this
colony regularly held over 10% of the Isle of Man population.
The most recent count available is
from 2010 when 447 pairs were recorded, compared to
670 pairs in 1999. Numbers may have been underestimated in this
colony in 2006; just 88 pairs were
recorded. Relatively few herring gulls on the Isle of Man have
been recorded nesting on roofs.
Productivity
No systematic data have been collected on
the productivity of herring gulls at colonies on the Isle of
Man as part of the SMP.
Population estimates and change 1969-2002 (census data)
| |
Operation Seafarer
(1969-70)
|
Seabird Colony Register
(1985-88)
|
Seabird 2000
(1998-2002)
|
| Population estimate (AON*) |
3,970 |
3,551 |
4,347 |
| % change since previous
census |
N/a |
-11 |
+22 |
* AON = Apparently Occupied Nests
Note: Inland colonies were not counted during
the two earlier national censuses, so to enable direct comparison
the Seabird 2000 figure refers to the coastal population only.
Breeding abundance
In common with other areas of the British Isles, the number of
herring gulls breeding in the Channel Islands also declined between
Operation Seafarer and the Seabird Colony Register, although the
size of this fall, a decline of 11%, was less
severe than elsewhere. Numbers increased by 22%
between the Seabird Colony Register and Seabird 2000. Few data
have been collected in the region since 1998-2002, so the
current status of the population is unknown.
Productivity
No systematic productivity data have been collected for
herring gull in the Channel Islands as part of the SMP.
No systematic data on phenology (timing of life-cycle events)
have been collected as part of the SMP.
No systematic data on diet have been collected as part of
the SMP.
Figure 2 shows there has been a slight decline in adult survival
over most of the study period. The extent to which this trend is
representative of the UK as a whole is not known.
1 Raven, S.J. and Coulson, J.C. 1997. The
distribution and abundance of Larus gulls nesting on
buildings in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study 44:
13-34.
2 Madden, B. and Newton, S.F. 2004.
Herring Gull Larus argentatus. In:
Mitchell, P.I., Newton, S.F., Ratcliffe, N.
and Dunn, T.E. (eds.) 2004. Seabird
Populations of Britain and Ireland:
242-262. Poyser, London.
3 Furness, R.W., Ensor, K. and Hudson,
A.V. 1992. The use of fishery waste by gull populations around the
British Isles. Ardea 80: 105-113.
4 Craik, J.C.A. 2010. Results of the
mink-seabird project in 2010. Scottish Association for Marine
Science, Oban.
Data have been provided to the SMP by the generous contributions
of its partners, other organisations and volunteers throughout
Britain and Ireland. Partners to the SMP are: BirdWatch Ireland;
The British Trust for Ornithology; Centre for Ecology and
Hydrology; Countryside Council for Wales; Department of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Isle of Man); Department of
Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Republic of Ireland);
States of Guernsey Government; JNCC; Manx Birdlife; Manx National
Heritage; The National Trust; National Trust for Scotland; Natural
England; Northern Ireland Environment Agency; The Royal Society for
the Protection of Birds; Scottish Natural Heritage; Seabird Group;
Shetland Oil Terminal Environmental Advisory Group; Scottish
Wildlife Trust. More about the SMP partners >>