Pierpoint, C.
Bycatch records of marine turtles are examined from the waters surrounding the UK and Eire. The primary sources of data for this region are records held in the database TURTLE (Pierpoint and Penrose 1999). Additional data have been gathered from marine mammal and discard monitoring programmes. Fishery interactions in other regions are reviewed and mitigation measures taken to reduce bycatch are also discussed.
Bycatch records of marine turtles are examined from the waters
surrounding the UK and Eire. The primary sources of data for this
region are records held in the database 'TURTLE' (Pierpoint &
Penrose 1999). Additional data have been gathered from marine
mammal and discard monitoring programmes. Fishery interactions in
other regions are reviewed and mitigation measures taken to reduce
bycatch are also discussed.
TURTLE currently holds 712 records of marine turtles in UK and
Irish waters and includes 154 records of turtle bycatch. Most
bycatch records involve the leatherback turtle (94% of records
identified to species), the species most frequently reported from
UK and Irish waters. There are a small number of records of
loggerhead, Kemp's ridley and hawksbill turtles. The most common
method of incidental capture for leatherback turtles is
entanglement in rope, particularly those used in pot fisheries
targeting crustaceans and whelk. Rope entanglement occurs
predominantly between July and October, on the north, west and
south-west coasts of the UK and the south and west coasts of Eire.
Of 83 capture records since 1980, entanglement in rope accounts for
36 records, 62% of leatherback bycatch for which the method of
capture was specified. Recorded mortality was 61%; 11 turtles are
known to have been released alive (30.5%). There are no data on
injury or post-release mortality.
The database also includes records of leatherback capture in
driftnets, trawls, set gill nets, purse seines and in longline
fisheries. Data from marine mammal and fisheries monitoring
programmes suggest that turtle bycatch in pelagic and demersal
trawls, and in set gill nets in UK and Irish waters is uncommon.
Bycatch of leatherback and loggerhead turtles is reported from
pelagic driftnet fisheries however. The number of animals captured
by the French tuna driftnet fleet in 1993 was estimated at 100
turtles (Gougon et al. 1993; SMRU 1996), most of which
were leatherbacks. Turtle bycatch was also recorded by observers in
the smaller Irish and UK driftnet fleets (E Rogan pers. comm.;
SMRU, 1996). All turtles taken by French vessels in 1992 and 1993
were reported to have been released alive; recorded mortality on UK
and Irish vessels was 25% and 17% respectively. No data are
available for vessels of pelagic longline fleets that target tuna
Thunnas spp. and swordfish Xiphias gladius in
approximately the same area as French, Irish and UK driftnetters.
High capture rates are reported from longline fisheries elsewhere
in the North Atlantic and in the Mediterranean Sea (e.g. Witzell
1984, Aguilar et al. 1992; Camiñas et al. 1992;
Johnson et al. 1999; Ferreira et al. in
prep.).
Hence, marine turtles are prone to accidental capture by a
wide variety of fishing methods. The highest known incidence of
bycatch in UK and Irish waters is recorded for leatherback turtles
in inshore pot fisheries and pelagic driftnets. The significance of
marine turtle bycatch in the region is not known. Leatherback
turtles are globally endangered however, and Spotila et al
(1996) suggest that the impact of bycatch on Atlantic leatherback
populations may be unsustainable.
Recommendations are made to further monitor
and address the impact of fishery interactions in
this region.
Please cite as: Pierpoint, C., (2000), Bycatch of marine turtles in UK and Irish waters, JNCC Report 310, 32 pages, ISSN 0963 8091