The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem
Services (IPBES)
If you would like to receive
information on future opportunities from IPBES and the
UK
IPBES Stakeholder Network, join the network by completing the form
>>>
Visit the Archive page for
information on past opportunities
Consultation on Second Order Draft (SODs) and Summary for
Policy Makers
The SODs and Summaries for Policy Makers of
the
Regional Assessments of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for
Africa, Asia-Pacific and Europe and Central Asia and the
Thematic Assessment of Land Degradation and Restoration
expert consultations run until 26 June 2017.
The Americas Assessment consultation period runs from 29
May - 24 July. To take part in the consultation,
create an
account on the IPBES website and sign up to the review
process.
Second Order Draft Consultations are fundamental to ensuring the
scientific credibility and accuracy of the IPBES process and
outputs and we would encourage you to review these releases.
Outline structures of the Regional Assessments and the Land
Degradation Assessment are available - contact us
here for more
information.
We encourage you to contribute to the reviews
by sending your responses directly to the Secretariat. If you think
your comments would be useful for developing the UK’s official
response please send it to us
here at JNCC as we will be working directly with Defra on the
response. Note that IPBES will only accept comments in the
spreadsheet template provided on the IPBES website.
The Global
Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services FOD
consultation will run from 15 June - 15 August and
experts will be sought to review and provide comment on the
assessment. Sign up to the UK IPBES
Stakeholder Network for updates and additional
information on this review.
The assessment assesses status and trends with
regard to biodiversity and ecosystem services, the impact of
biodiversity and ecosystem services on human well-being and the
effectiveness of responses, including the Strategic Plan and its
Aichi Biodiversity Targets. It is anticipated that this
deliverable will contribute to the process for the evaluation and
renewal of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity and its Aichi
Biodiversity Targets.
Report from IPBES 5 held in March in Bonn, Germany
 |
 |
| Sir Bob Watson, IPBES Chair |
UK Delegation
to IPBES |
The fifth meeting of IPBES members was held in
Bonn between 7-10 March. 100 countries (of the 123 members) were
represented and many other countries and organisations were present
as observers.
The meeting covered a range of subjects (on
which more below) all of which were overshadowed by the need to
continue on-going and new work under severe budgetary constraints.
Eventually a budget of $8.7m matched with current balance and
anticipated income for 2017 was agreed, albeit with significant
savings from planned activities in the work programme and reluctant
acceptance that no new assessments could be started this year;
although this might be pragmatic given the availability of experts
whilst six major assessments are on-going.
For the European Union the meeting concluded
with them having enhanced status allowing fuller participation in
IPBES. The Commission has indicated that enhanced status would
enable them, subject to approval by the Horizon 2020 Programme
Committee, to provide funding on a similar basis to IPCC -
potentially €4m, over 4 years. But they were not able to make a
pledge to the Trust Fund at this plenary.
Most of the meeting saw participants divided
into two working groups. Working Group one spent considerable time
discussing the approach for recognising and working with indigenous
and local knowledge (ILK) within the platform. This was a long,
complex and technical discussion with potential wider
implications. The approach includes a ‘participatory
mechanism’ including a roster of experts and dialogue meetings,
subject to available resources. The most difficult issue was
the handling of consent from Indigenous Peoples and Local
Communities (IPLCs) to use ILK within IPBES activities including a
reference to free prior informed consent. Working Group One
also negotiated the terms of reference for the first review of
effectiveness of the procedures of the platform, including
establishment of an external review, though this was also deferred
until necessary funding is available.
In Working Group 2 there were protracted
negotiations on the scope of the proposed thematic assessment on
sustainable use of wild species. The Thursday evening session
finished at 1.00am. Attempts were made to limit the scope of the
assessment and eventually wording was found that would allow the
experts undertaking the assessment to determine a pragmatic
approach to the number of taxa and the frequency of use of wild
species to make the work manageable. The scope will cover some
species from all biomes including marine. Although the scope was
agreed, the timing for initiation of the review was subject to
available resources. There were also inconclusive discussions
on the respective priorities and timing for the two other pending
assessments on valuation and invasive alien species. Most
developing countries favoured an assessment on sustainable use.
There was a commitment to review the scope and give priority to
initiate these pending assessments in the work programme when
funding is available. The work on capacity building was widely
accepted and the decisions were quickly agreed but these are also
subject to available funding. A third forum on capacity building
was deferred.
Plenary also accepted the use of the term
‘nature’s contributions to people (NCP)’ as a more universally
accepted term for ecosystem services or nature’s benefits (noting
that nature’s contributions could be negative as a well as
positive). See http://www.ipbes.net/plenary/ipbes-5
under information documents number 24 for further information.
The UK pledged £150k in 2017 and 2018 to the
voluntary Trust Fund (retaining some flexibility for additional
‘in-kind’ support).
For another view on IPBES 5 please see
http://enb.iisd.org/ipbes/ipbes5/
For a quick refresher on what IPBES does, see
this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeZScdbBz-M
About IPBES
In 2012 the world’s governments agreed to establish the
Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and
Ecosystem Services (IPBES) as a mechanism for strengthening the
global science-policy interface (SPI) for biodiversity and
ecosystem services. SPIs are aimed at people in science and/or
policy interested in engaging with the ’other’ community. People
link up to communicate, exchange ideas, and jointly develop
knowledge for enhancing policy and decision-making processes and
research. This involves exchanging information and knowledge
leading to learning and ultimately to changed behaviour - doing
something different as a result of the learning.
IPBES members are committed to building the platform as the
leading intergovernmental body for assessing the state of the
planet's biodiversity, its ecosystems and the essential services
they provide to society.
IPBES responds to requests for scientific information related to
biodiversity and ecosystem services from Governments, relevant
multilateral environmental agreements and United Nations bodies, as
well as other relevant stakeholders. The work IPBES carries out
includes:
- identifying and prioritising key scientific information needed
for policymakers;
- cataloguing and critically reviewing assessments relating to
biodiversity and ecosystem services;
- supporting policy formulation and implementation by identifying
policy-relevant tools and methodologies; and
- identifying key capacity-building needs to improve the
science-policy interface.

For a larger version of this diagram,
download as
a PDF
UK IPBES
The UK government pledged £2 million, from
Defra and
DfID, from 2011-2015 to help support IPBES, with Defra
making further pledges to support the 2016-2017 work
programme. JNCC’s role is supporting Defra in achieving a pragmatic
evidence-based approach to IPBES and its work building on existing
initiatives, and by facilitating efficient engagement with the UK
biodiversity science and policy communities. JNCC brings together
UK and European experts on globally important work on biodiversity
and ecosystem services through the delivery of the UK IPBES
Stakeholder Hub. Working in partnership with Defra, JNCC shape
the work of IPBES and support UK experts in their contributions to
IPBES assessments, covering a diverse range of topics from land
degradation and restoration, to scenarios and modelling.
Defra and JNCC represent the UK’s interests at the annual IPBES
Plenary as well as at the extensive programme of stakeholder
meetings and workshops supported by experts in the biodiversity and
ecosystem service field. Defra and JNCC are also responsible for
reviewing IPBES papers and assessments, and organising meetings to
engage UK experts and stakeholders.
IPBES eLearning Module
An IPBES eLearning
module, is available to help assessment practitioners, from
sub-national to global scales, understand and apply the IPBES
conceptual framework within the context of a national or IPBES
assessment (global, regional, thematic, methodological). It
comprises three 30-40 minute lessons and can be used on desktops,
laptops and tablets, as well as offline.
IPBES Webinars
The webinar series is produced by the IPBES Secretariat to build
capacity for those involved in or interested in IPBES. It
provides information on IPBES' processes and outputs.
- Webinar 1: The
IPBES Assessment Process
- Webinar 2: The
Conceptual Framework
- Webinar 3: The
IPBES Pollination Report outcomes and lessons
learnt
- Webinar 4:
Guide relating to varied conceptualizations of
value